2001-2002 Annual Meeting
Women’s Meeting
The meeting was held Friday, December 7, 2001
In attendance: Daniel Sharadin, Commissioner; Tom Tracey, Director
of Officials; Mike McDowell, Director of Communication; Scott Reed,
George Washington; Jim Floerchinger, Harvard; Amber Drury-Pinto,
Michigan; Sandy Sheridan, Hartwick; Mike Maroney, Hartwick;
Christine Honig, Marist; Jim Kelly, Wagner; Barry King, Indiana;
Keith Bullion, Grove City; Carey Heckman, Dartmouth; Luis Nicolao,
Princeton; Jim Yeamans, Slippery Rock; Josh Heynes, Penn State
Behrend; Don Sherman, Gannon; Todd Clapper, Brown; John Zeigler,
Bucknell; Carl Quigley, St. Francis; Derek Ellingson, Queens;
Allyson Gillespie, Villanova; Joe Linehan, U. S. Merchant Marine
Academy
The meeting began with a discussion of the various proposals.
Women’s Varsity Schedule Proposal 1
The Commissioner made a motion to limit the ability to change the
women’s varsity schedule on odd numbered years and that any
change proposed on even numbered years must first have the support
of 75% of the coaches present and eligible to vote. Allyson
Gillespie seconded. Motion passed.
Women’s Varsity Schedule Proposal 2
Michael Maroney withdrew this proposal.
Women’s Varsity Schedule Proposal 3
Michael Maroney made a motion to create a seeding committee that
will seed all women’s championships. Allyson Gillespie
seconded. Motion passed.
Women’s General Proposal 1
Michael Maroney made a motion that women’s coaches must
submit tournament statistics when nominating a player for the
All-Tournament Team at Eastern Championships and that fees be
increased to pay for a staff member to collate these statistics
during the event. Allyson Gillespie seconded. Motion failed.
Women’s General Proposal 2
Michael Maroney made a motion that would require members to sign a
two-year commitment to the CWPA in order to vote at a CWPA meeting
on women’s water polo issues. Allyson Gillespie seconded.
Motion failed.
Women’s General Proposal 3
Michael Maroney made a motion that a poll committee is created for
the purpose of conducting a weekly poll that includes additional
teams receiving votes and the number of votes they received. This
poll committee will also serve as the body responsible for seeding
the women’s championship events. Todd Clapper seconded.
Motion passed.
A motion was made by Mike Maroney to include the top ten teams
in the weekly poll, with any additional teams receiving votes
listed at the bottom in paragraph form, including their vote
totals. John Zeigler seconded. Motion passed.
Women’s General Proposal 4
Michael Maroney made a motion that requires a one-year suspension
for any CWPA team that qualifies for a post season championship as
the CWPA representative and fails to attend. Jim Kelly seconded.
Motion failed. By consensus the women’s coaches are not
supporting the National Collegiate Select Championship as an event
that will mandate participation by CWPA teams that qualify to go.
While they believe it to be a worthwhile tournament, it should
remain the individual institution’s right to decline without
penalty.
New Business
Allyson Gillespie made a motion that the Eastern Championship
field consist of the top five teams from the Northern Division and
the top five teams from the Southern Division, as per their finish
in each of their respective championships. The remaining two teams
will be chosen At-large by the Poll Committee, who shall also seed
the tournament. Seconded by Derek Ellingson. Motion passed.
The format for the tournament was discussed at length and it was
determined that the twelve-team format currently used will serve as
the approved version.
Discussion included the role and make-up of the Poll
Committee.
Keith Bullion made a motion that the committee be comprised of two
members from the northern region and two members from the southern
region and the chair be from the region that won the prior season.
Todd Clapper seconded. Motion failed.
Barry King made a motion that the committee is comprised of one
individual from each region (NY, NE, MS, AL) and the chair be
selected during the annual meeting by a vote of the eligible
coaches. Allyson Seconded. Motion passed.
Joe Linehan was voted as the chair. The meeting then divided into
regions and the coaches from each region selected the following
individuals to the committee: John Zeigler, Amber Pinto, Mike
Maroney, and Jim Floerchinger.
The five-member committee will have the following duties and will
serve one-year terms:
* Rank the top 10 CWPA women’s teams each week
* Seed the Northern and Southern Division tournaments
* Select the two at-large teams for the Eastern Championships
* Seed the Eastern Championships
The Commissioner noted that the poll committee must have two
conference calls during the season, one immediately following the
regular season to seed the divisional championships and one
following the divisional championships to seed the Eastern
Championships.
Men’s Meeting
The meeting was held Friday, December 7, 2001
In attendance: Daniel Sharadin, Commissioner; Tom Tracey, Director
of Officials; Mike McDowell, Director of Communication; Scott Reed,
George Washington; Jim Floerchinger, Harvard; Keith Bullion, Grove
City; Carey Heckman, Dartmouth; Luis Nicolao, Princeton; Jim
Yeamans, Slippery Rock; Josh Heynes, Penn State Behrend; Don
Sherman, Gannon; Todd Clapper, Brown; John Zeigler, Bucknell; Carl
Quigley, St. Francis; Derek Ellingson, Queens; Joe Linehan, U. S.
Merchant Marine Academy; Russ Yarworth, Massachusetts; Roch King,
Bloomsburg
Men’s Varsity Schedule Proposal
1
The Commissioner made a motion to limit the ability to change the
men’s varsity schedule on odd numbered years and that any
change proposed on even numbered years must first have the support
of 75% of the coaches present and eligible to vote. Mike Schofield
seconded. Motion passed.
Men’s Varsity Schedule Proposal 2
The Commissioner made a motion that the first available date for
league competition will be the third weekend in September. Seconded
by Carl Quigley. Motion passed.
Men’s Varsity Schedule Proposal 3
The Commissioner made a motion to establish the following
priorities in the scheduling process in order to clarify how the
games will be assigned:
1. Satisfy institutional constraints regarding individual team
travel
2. Satisfy institutional requests regarding time and location
preferences while maintaining a fair competitive schedule.
3. Provide home games for as many teams as possible within the
following parameters:
a. No team will be required to travel more than one hour from one
site to another during the same weekend.
b. No team will be required to travel more than 30 minutes during
the same day from one site to another.
c. Provide marquee match-ups for prime time on Saturday night.
d. Provide late arrival and early departure for teams traveling
the longest distances.
e. Provide an opportunity for all member teams to have home games
at least every other year.
Carl Quigley seconded. Motion passed.
Men’s Varsity Schedule Proposal 4
Jim Yeamans made a motion to add a second cross-over weekend to
the southern division schedule. Don Sherman seconded. Before a vote
could be taken, a decision was made to split the meeting and have
each of the divisions meet separately to arrive at a consensus for
their respective schedules.
After reconvening, teams decided to withdraw all other scheduling
proposals and the Southern Division decided not to act on Proposal
4.
In the Northern Division Todd Clapper made a motion to approve the
schedule format as follows:
Teams will play a complete round robin schedule. The teams in the
New England region (CT, Brown, MIT, Harvard, UMass) and the teams
in the New York region will play their crossover games during two
weekends of competition, one of which is in the northern region and
one of which is at Fordham (or any other facility meeting maximum
size regulations in the New York area). The crossover weekend must
be in a 30-meter all-deep facility (Fordham meets the requirement
by mutual agreement). Games between teams within the same region
have the option to be pulled for home and home match-ups or played
in a tournament format. Since CT College is further from other
teams in their region, Todd Clapper indicated that Brown would go
to Connecticut to play there. Likewise, Harvard and other teams
indicated their willingness to play at Connecticut on Friday, on
their way to New York City in order to ensure CT College receives
home games. Lastly, teams must let the office know in advance if
they prefer to play all of their crossover games on one day or
extend their competition over two days. Derek Ellingson seconded.
Motion passed.
Men’s Varsity Schedule Proposals 5a, 5b, 5c, 5d were
withdrawn
Men’s Varsity Schedule Proposal 6
Russ Yarworth made a motion to restructure the Northern Division
Championships to the following 10-team format.
Joe Linehan seconded. Motion passed.
Division III Issues
The Division III issues were then discussed and by consensus, it
was determined that the Division III regional tournament would be
invitational in nature and not coordinated by the CWPA office. The
host team would be responsible for sending the invitations,
collecting fees and paying the officials.
Keith Bullion requested that a mail ballot be issued to the
Division III coaches, explaining the seeding concept for
women’s championships and asking if they want to continue
their present policy in which every coach receives a vote or use
the women’s method of selecting a poll committee. The
Commissioner indicated he would send it out following the
meeting.
Josh Heynes made a motion that the CWPA help coordinate a Division
III National Championship that would be self-funded. Joe Linehan
seconded. Motion passed.
Keith Bullion made a motion that the CWPA conduct a poll to
establish a ranking of officials after the Division III Eastern
Championship. The result of this ranking will assign the referees
for the following year for the invitational and championship. Teams
would be required to send in their poll as part of the mail ballot
in the future, or be present to vote at the annual meeting.
Seconded by Joe Linehan. Motion passed. Commissioner’s Note:
Assignments based in part on availability. Ranking will only serve
to create a priority list from which the officials are chosen based
on their availability.
Keith Bullion made a motion that the Eastern Division III
Championship Site Selection be adopted as follows:
| Year | Site of Invitational | Site of Championship |
| 2001 | USMMA (N) | Grove City College (S) |
| 2002 | Washington & Jefferson (S) | MIT (N) |
| 2003 | Connecticut College (N) | Johns Hopkins University (S) |
| 2004 | Penn State Behrend (S) | USMMA (N) |
| 2005 | MIT (N) | Washington & Jefferson (S) |
| 2006 | Grove City College (S) | Connecticut College (N) |
| 2007 | USMMA (N) | Penn State Behrend (S) |
| 2008 | Johns Hopkins University (S) | MIT (N) |
Seconded by Josh Heynes. Motion passed.
The Commissioner requested that the Southern Division clarify
their rotation within their regular season. Teams indicated that
the schedule should be constructed same as last season. The
crossover will alternate between regions. Teams in the Southern
region will travel to Bucknell, while Johns Hopkins and George
Washington will receive home games. Navy or Princeton will host the
championship and crossover when it rotates to the region.
In the western region, three basic regions were established.
W&J/Salem was region 1, Slippery Rock/Grove City was region 2,
and Erie was region 3. It was understood that teams in each of
these regions would not all get home league games each season.
Dates were established as follows:
9/21-22 Regular season event
10/5-6 Regular season event
10/12-13 Division III Eastern Championships
10/19-20 Regular season event
10/26-27 ECAC Championships
11/2-3 Division Championships
11/16-17 Eastern Championships
11/30-12/1 NCAA Championships
NCAA Championships are actually 12/7-8
The Commissioner stressed the importance for coaches to send their
preferences regarding scheduling before the schedule is drafted.
Coaches are required to send in their preferences by the week
following the meeting.
The Commissioner stated he would develop a rotation for
championships that posted the crossover locations for the divisions
as well as the championship sites. The current rotation is as
follows:
| Year | Easterns | Northern | Southern | ECAC | NCO | SCO |
| 2001 | Princeton | Brown | Navy | Harvard | NA | Princeton |
| 2002 | Brown | Harvard | Princeton | Navy | TBD | Grove City |
| 2003 | Navy | Harvard | Bucknell | Brown | TBD | TBD |
| 2004 | Bucknell | Brown | Princeton | Harvard | TBD | TBD |
| 2005 | Harvard | Brown | Navy | Princeton | TBD | TBD |
| 2006 | Princeton | Harvard | Bucknell | Brown | TBD | TBD |
| 2007 | Brown | Harvard | Navy | Bucknell | TBD | TBD |
| 2008 | Navy | Brown | Princeton | Harvard | TBD | TBD |
| 2009 | Harvard | Brown | Bucknell | Princeton | TBD | TBD |
| 2010 | Bucknell | Harvard | Navy | Brown | TBD | TBD |
General Meeting
The meeting was held Friday, December 7, 2001
In attendance: Daniel Sharadin, Commissioner; Tom Tracey, Director
of Officials; Mike McDowell, Director of Communication; Scott Reed,
George Washington; Jim Floerchinger, Harvard; Amber Drury-Pinto,
Michigan; Sandy Sheridan, Hartwick; Mike Maroney, Hartwick;
Christine Honig, Marist; Jim Kelly, Wagner; Barry King, Indiana;
Keith Bullion, Grove City; Carey Heckman, Dartmouth; Luis Nicolao,
Princeton; Jim Yeamans, Slippery Rock; Josh Heynes, Penn State
Behrend; Don Sherman, Gannon; Todd Clapper, Brown; John Zeigler,
Bucknell; Carl Quigley, St. Francis; Derek Ellingson, Queens;
Allyson Gillespie, Villanova; Joe Linehan, U. S. Merchant Marine
Academy, ; Russ Yarworth, Massachusetts; Roch King, Bloomsburg
The Commissioner gave a presentation outlining the annual report
for the organization.
As part of the Strategic Plan, Bill Bettencourt from Arena made a
presentation soliciting the CWPA’s involvement in a
partnership. The relationship would involve naming the Arena ball
as the official ball of the CWPA. Arena would provide product and
cash in exchange for certain requirements. The Commissioner
indicated he would review the agreement and discuss the proposal
with the Board.
Elections were held for the Board of Review. Jim Floerchinger,
Allyson Gillespie, John Benedick, Loren Bertocci were named, with
one referee still to be appointed by agreement from Loren Bertocci
and Tom Tracey.
Elections for the Board of Directors were held and John Benedick
was elected as the administrator, Scott Reed as the coach, and
Stuart Sheldon as the non administrator/coach.
The Commissioner explained the crowd control policy approved by
the Board of Directors this past year that will become policy for
future competitive events.
The membership then considered the following proposals. The result
of voting on these proposals included the mail ballots submitted
earlier to the office.
General Membership Proposal 1
The Commissioner made a motion to add the following statement to
the CWPA Code of Conduct: Consumption of alcoholic beverages or use
of tobacco products is prohibited at all CWPA events by spectators,
officials, coaches, and athletes. Motion seconded by John Zeigler.
Motion passed.
General Membership Proposal 2
Amber Pinto made a motion to establish an All-Academic Conference
Team for all levels and genders. The requirements would be:
* 3.2 or better GPA
* Completed the season with their team
* Competed/played in at least 3 conference games
Carey Heckman seconded. Motion passed.
General Membership Proposal 3
The Commissioner made a motion to create a standing committee to
review nominations submitted for the Hall of Fame based on criteria
previously established and to make selections as required. Allyson
Gillespie seconded. The committee members include Todd Clapper,
John Zeigler, Carl Quigley, Dan Sharadin. In the future, all
members selected to the Hall of Fame will become voting members.
Motion passed.
General Membership Proposal 4
The Commissioner made a motion to require the CWPA Office to
assume the game management duties for the following events:
Eastern Varsity Championships
National Collegiate Club Championships
Division III National Collegiate Club Championships
Game management duties include:
1. Staffing the official’s desk and merchandise table. Teams
would still be responsible for facility related set up and clean
up.
2. Printing a tournament program.
3. When possible, printing a tournament shirt.
In addition, dependent upon availability from the CWPA staff, the
host of a regular season contest or division championship may also
request this service. The fees for this position will be generated
from the gate receipts generated at the events. The host will not
receive any portion of the gate. Amber Pinto seconded. Motion
passed.
Officiating Proposals
Officiating Proposal 1
The Commissioner made a motion that the determination of a protest
made following a game may only be appealed under the following
circumstances:
1. The protest had to be filed in accordance with NCAA rules.
2. There must be grounds to show that the referees made a
significant error in the process of reviewing the protest that
prevented a fair conclusion.
3. If the determination of the protest is overturned, the solution
to the problem must be reasonably managed or the initial judgment
stands, regardless of its fairness. Reasonably managed means:
* The teams involved must not bear any extraordinary costs
* The CWPA must be capable of providing the support necessary
* There must be available time to solve the problem
To appeal the protest, a copy of the protest must be sent to the
CWPA office along with a brief explanation regarding why the appeal
is warranted, within 48 hours of the conclusion the event.
The proposal was seconded by Luis Nicolao. Motion passed.
Officiating Proposal 2
The Commissioner made a motion that will permit the CWPA to use
video to review a protest, fight, or brutality under the conditions
stated below. Seconded by Allyson Gillespie.
After some discussion, John Zeigler made a motion to amend the
language to eliminate any reference to protests. Jim Floerchinger
seconded. Amendment passed.
The Commissioner clarified that this motion would also include
video to review brutalities committed during the contest that were
missed by the official, provided a visible injury resulted from the
brutality.
The original motion is submitted below, including the language
that was removed and added.
Final Proposal
The Commissioner made a motion that will permit the CWPA to use
video to review a protest, fight, or brutality under the following
conditions:
During the tournament
1. Video will only be used in the case of protests and brutalities
and not to review judgment calls made by the officials during a
game. Video may not be used to determine goals scored, as this
falls under the judgment responsibilities of the officials
present.
2. Video may be used to review alleged brutalities missed by the
officials, provided the alleged incident caused a visible
injury.
3. A formal protest must be filed, or an unusual circumstance must
surround the brutality before the use of video can be discussed.
When determining the use of video to review brutalities, an unusual
circumstance is defined as a brutality that was unique in its
severity or one that injured another player, requiring a decision
by the head official and the tournament committee regarding whether
additional sanctions are necessary during the tournament for the
purposes of protecting the other athletes.
4. The video must be made available to the head referee within
five minutes of the game’s conclusion. The head referee in
consultation with the tournament committee must make a
determination within ten minutes.
5. Unless the video conclusively shows otherwise, the judgment of
the officials at the time the incident occurred takes priority in
the situation. The head referee, as chair of the tournament
committee will be responsible for making the determination
regarding whether the video is conclusive.
Video submitted to the CWPA office
1. Video will only be used in the case of protests and brutalities
and not to review judgment calls made by the officials during a
game. Video may not be used to determine goals scored, as this
falls under the judgment responsibilities of the officials
present.
2. Video may be used to review alleged brutalities missed by the
officials, provided the alleged incident caused a visible
injury.
3. All video must be submitted to the office by 5:00 PM EST within
two days following the game. For tournaments ending on Sunday, this
would mean Tuesday at 5:00 PM EST.
4. Unless the video conclusively shows otherwise, the judgment of
the officials at the time the incident occurred takes priority in
the situation. The Commissioner, in consultation with the Director
of Officials, will be responsible for making the determination
regarding whether the video is conclusive. Any observations from
the video will then be forwarded to the Board of Review for their
recommendations. When possible, the video will be sent digitally to
the members of the Board of Review. Motion passed.
Officiating Proposal 3
Jim Floerchinger withdrew proposal
Officiating Proposal 4
Jim Floerchinger withdrew proposal
New Business
Allyson Gillespie made a motion to move the annual meeting to
Monday instead of Friday. John Zeigler seconded. Motion failed.
Todd Clapper made a motion that the men establish a weekly Top 10
poll. Mike Schofield seconded. Committee will include Jim
Floerchinger, John Zeigler, Joe Linehan, Price Atkinson, and one
member yet to be named. Motion passed.
The Commissioner confirmed that the women’s Southern
Division format would remain unchanged for the next two years, with
the Mid Atlantic region using a double round robin format and the
Allegheny region using a single round robin format. Rotation of
sites will move in the following manner: Easterns rotates between
North, South, and West regions. Southern Championships rotates
between all regulation facilities, ensuring that Easterns and
Southerns are in two different regions during the same year. The
championship rotation will be as follows:
| Year | Easterns | Southern Championship |
| 2003 | Harvard | Bucknell |
| 2004 | Bucknell | Michigan |
| 2005 | Indiana | Princeton |
| 2006 | North | Grove City |
| 2007 | Princeton | Indiana |
| 2008 | Michigan | Villanova |
| 2009 | North | Bucknell |
On even years the regular season tournaments will be held at
Indiana and on odd years, at Michigan. The remaining tournament
will be at Salem/Washington & Jefferson, Erie, or Grove
City/Slippery Rock, with pulled games to ensure home contests at as
many institutions as possible. Schedule approved by consensus with
no dissent.
Meeting adjourned 6:30 PM.
Club Proposals
The club proposals were decided by mail ballot. Each team in the
country had the opportunity to vote. The results of the voting are
listed below.
Club General Proposal 1
The Commissioner made a motion to increase the rate of pay to
officials on the club level over the next four years according to
the following scale:
2002 $32.00
2003 $34.00
2004 $36.00
2005 $38.00
Motion passed.
Club Eligibility Proposal 1a
The Commissioner made a motion to establish the eligibility of a
club athlete as follows:
1. If an athlete has participated on a varsity water polo team for
any length of time (junior college or four-year institution), that
athlete has a total of four years of eligibility, including the
year(s) played on the varsity level. Furthermore, a redshirt year
counts as a year of varsity competition.
2. Athletes competing on a varsity water polo team during a season
are ineligible to compete for a club team during that same
season.
3. Club teams competing for institutions with varsity programs
must submit a roster to the office before their first week of
competition. Additions may be made during the season, provided they
are sent to the office a week prior to the athletes’ first
date of competition. Failure to do so may result in the
team’s forfeiture of games played with athletes not listed on
the roster.
Example 1: A player competes for a varsity team and quits during
his/her freshman year after a month. That athlete has used one of
his/her four years of eligibility and is ineligible to compete for
a club team during the season he left the varsity team. He/she may
play for a club team beginning next season for a period of no more
than three years.
Example 2: A player redshirts his first year and decides to quit
prior to his sophomore year. He/she is eligible to compete for a
club team a maximum of three years beginning with the next
season.
Example 3: A player competes for a varsity program for four years.
He/she is ineligible to compete for a club team on the graduate or
undergraduate level.
Example 4: A player competes four years on a club level. He/she
may compete for a club team during graduate school provided
enrollment is full-time.
Motion Failed
Club Eligibility Proposal 1b
Chico State made a motion to establish eligibility for women's
club competition as follows: Any athlete who has competed at the
Division I level for over one year is ineligible to play club water
polo in the CWPA. This includes athletes who have exhausted their
NCAA eligibility and any athlete who name has appeared on a
division I roster for more then one year.
Motion failed.
Club Eligibility Proposal 1c
Chris Borasi, Head Coach, (UC Davis) made a motion to establish
club eligibility for women’s Pacific Coast Division
competition as follows:
This proposal is to add a rule for the Women's Club Division in
the Collegiate Water Polo Association, Pacific Coast Division, for
the 2002 season. The rule would state that only graduate and
undergraduate students at a university enrolled in the CWPA's
Pacific Coast Division who have not completed four years of
intercollegiate water polo may compete.
Motion failed.
Club Eligibility Proposal 2
Eppie Silva, Cal Sate University Fresno, made a motion to require
that each member of the association write up a roster and submit it
to the institution’s registry office. After they have
verified each student’s status, one copy shall be sent to the
CWPA and another to the championship host school. A referee or a
host school advisor shall check the names along with a picture ID
in order to verify each student. This does not have to be done for
every tournament just the tournament that leads into nationals. If
a school would like to add a player to the roster they must be
verified by the school registry and copies must be sent and
received before the tournament.
Motion failed.
Club Eligibility Proposal 3
Doug Reisenfeld, Miami University(OH) made a motion that any
program fielding two teams in the division may, at any time, move a
player up from a "B" team roster to take a spot on an "A" team
roster. Once a player is "moved up", that same player can no longer
play on the "B" team. This only applies to a move up from the "B"
squad to the "A" squad. No player may be "demoted" to the "B"
team.
Motion passed.
















